Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta etnografía. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta etnografía. Mostrar todas las entradas

CFP: SPECIAL ISSUE RELIGIONS JOURNAL "RE-STAGING THE PERIPHERY AS THE CENTER: WOMEN COMMUNITIES IN EAST ASIAN RELIGIONS"

"Re-staging the Periphery as the Center: Women Communities in East Asian Religions",

Special Issue, Religions Journal


Dear Colleagues,

We would like to draw your attention to the special issue "Re-staging the Periphery as the Center: Women Communities in East Asian Religions" to be published by Religions. We invite empirical and theoretical contributions on women’s roles, identities, and communities in a broad range of East Asian religious traditions, lay or monastic, institutional or non-institutional based, communal or voluntary. Therefore, religious traditions involved include not only the more institutionalized forms of religions such as Buddhism, Daoism, Confucianism, Shinto, but also popular/folk/sectarian religions, NRM, smaller-scale village religious communities, voluntary organizations, impromptu religious gatherings, ancestor worship, etc. We look at both the localized forms of female religious communities, and also the transnational movement of religious sisterhoods (e.g., Bhikkhuni movements or regional migration of vegetarian nuns). Particularly welcomed are papers with a focus on:
  • Ethnographies of women’s religious communities (lay or monastic);
  • Female religious lineages, doctrines, networks;
  • Female alchemy in Daoist tradition;
  • Histories of female temples and other religious spaces;
  • Women’s religious communities and material culture (devotional or liturgical objects, images, sacred space, etc.);
  • Women’s religio-kinship networks;
  • Local, regional and transnational religious sisterhoods
  • Women’s communal religious life, activities, rituals;
  • Social life of religious women (i.e., religious women as entrepreneurs, political activists);
  • Domestic life of religious women (i.e., re-centering the family, the household of women, re-enacting kitchen as ritual space);
  • Religious food practices (vegetarianism, culinary piety);
  • Biographies of Bhikkhunis, priestesses, female religious practitioners, performers, Chinese vegetarian nuns (zhaigu), etc.;
  • Textual traditions of female religious communities, and the reception of female-centered texts;
  • Interfaith dialogues;
  • Lay Buddhism/Household Buddhism, lay religiosity;
  • Gender empowerment, gender equality, religious egalitarianism.
Interested authors please submit an expression of interest (with proposed title, abstract of 300 words and a short biography) to the guest editors Dr Ying Ruo Show (arisyr@nus.edu.sg) and Dr Jingjing Li (j.li@hum.leidenuniv.nl) by 30 June 2022. Full length articles of about 8000 words including references are due by 31 December 2022. All papers are subject to double-blind peer review.

Special Issue Information:

In East Asian traditions, women have always been active participants in religious affairs. However, their stories tend to be excluded from the standard historical narrative to consolidate the social norm of inner–outer distinction. Such a narrative chooses not to position women on the central stage of the outer, public domain as their male counterparts, but rather push women to the periphery as secluded members of the inner quarters for their religious cultivation. Recent scholarship has substantially problematized this exclusive narrative. In the burgeoning field that intersects gender and religion, scholars of Chinese history have scrutinized the (often biased) gendered historical representation of women to underscore their subjectivities (Jia, Kang and Yao 2014; Kang 2017; Yao 2021). Indeed, Chinese women not only participated in the Buddhist modernist movement during the 20th century (Travagnin 2017; DeVido [forthcoming 2024]), but also played central roles in the post-Mao religious revitalization (Qin 2000; Sun 2014). In parallel, as shown in the research of Japanese religions, women collaborated to refashion female monasticism, as epitomized by the effort of a group of privately professed women to reinstall the nun’s ordination order in Hokkeiji (Meeks 2010), and the multiple roles of Shin Buddhist temple wives who were not only good wives and wise mothers but also supported priests (Starling 2013). Likewise, studies on the forgotten lineages of Buddhist women in Korea have prompted scholars to reconnect the thriving nun communities in contemporary South Korea with their historical legacy (Cho 2011).

Restaging the periphery as the center, this Special Issue aims to investigate how women in East Asian religions throughout history have harnessed various resources to carve a space for their communities and thus reshape the religious landscape in their societies. In particular, this issue enriches the current discussions on the structure of religious organization, community activities/rituals and networks initiated and maintained by women groups. How are the migration patterns, religious practices, community networks, and kinship resources of East Asian religious women similar or different? Can we put them in dialogue with each other? Are there feminist traits in their history that would be helpful for us to forge regional or transnational connections? A comparative approach to studying religious women in East Asia and in the East Asia cultural sphere (such as countries of Southeast Asia that received significant influence from East Asia) would highlight the interconnectivity of the region and reveals patterns of how gender history and religious history intersect, collide and inter-penetrate. Thereby, we invite empirical and theoretical contributions on women’s roles, identities, and communities in a broad range of East Asian religious traditions, lay or monastic, institutional or non-institutional based, communal or voluntary. Therefore, religious traditions involved include not only the more institutionalized forms of religions such as Buddhism, Daoism, Confucianism, Shinto, but also popular/folk/sectarian religions, NRM, smaller-scale village religious communities, voluntary organizations, impromptu religious gatherings, ancestor worship, etc. We look at both the localized forms of female religious communities, and also the transnational movement of religious sisterhoods (e.g., Bhikkhuni movements or regional migration of vegetarian nuns).

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at here by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

CFP: MIGRATION METHODOLOGIES: CHALLENGES, INNOVATIONS AND CONCEPTUAL IMPLICATIONS FOR ASIAN MIGRATIONS


Migration Methodologies:

Challenges, Innovations and Conceptual Implications for Asian Migrations


Migration flows of unprecedented volume and complexity within, as well as in and out of Asia have become one of the main drivers of contemporary social change in the region. Major travel restrictions and curtailments in recent months brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic have further raised severe concerns over the potential impacts and implications of ongoing curbs. In these contexts, approaches to studying international migration have highlighted the institutions, infrastructures, processes, practices, consequences and experiences of migration while attending to its multi-directional, multi-sited, multi-causal and open-ended nature. New spatialities and temporalities – from transnational families, mobile cities, diaspora-and-development, global care chains, contact zones, spaces of encounter, travel bubbles/corridors/sandbox to multinational migrations – have animated migration research as material borders and socially constructed boundary lines are transgressed, rigidified or redrawn in the face of multiple-, hyper- and transnational migrations and mobilities.

In view of the increasing conceptual breadth and theoretical sophistication of international migration scholarship, it follows that our research practices need to evolve to embrace the quickened pace of mobilities and the heightened sense of transience, simultaneity and otherness experienced by the migrant (and non-migrant) subject within interlocking lifeworlds. As Collins and Huang (2012, p.270) observe, contemporary migration scholarship “draws on a wide range of research methodologies, reflecting the multi-disciplinary character of the field, the diverse sites and subjects of migration, and the varied concepts and theories that underpin this area of study”. These methodologies have broadened to include computational, quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method approaches and techniques as exemplified by the use of longitudinal surveys, sequence analysis, social networks analysis; mental mapping, multi-sited ethnographies, go-along ethnography, visual ethnography, life-story interviews, paired/unpaired interviews, participatory methods and data visualization techniques (Büscher, Urry, and Witchger, 2010; Amelina and Faist, 2012; Meeus, 2012; Martiniello, 2017; Fauser, 2018; Ryan and D’Angelo, 2018).

Despite “all this methodological development, innovation and cross-fertilisation” within the scholarship on migration, the discipline has – to date – failed to fully explore, interrogate, review and compare the merit and design of such methods (Collins and Huang, 2012, p.270). The authors continue to argue that there has also been limited “reflection on the ethical and conceptual implications of these choices” (Collins and Huang, 2010, p.270). This workshop responds to their observation by providing a collaborative forum to bring together migration scholars with diverse methodological interests and expertise.

We invite papers that focus on innovative methodological approaches while drawing on substantive findings relevant to “Asian migrations” (broadly defined to refer to migration flows within, as well as in and out of Asia) in order to grapple with the challenges and possibilities in conducting migration research. Contextually grounded papers that pursue one or more of the following questions are particularly welcome:
  • How do we research new migration-led spatialities and temporalities in (im)mobile times across interconnected worlds and/or during a pandemic?
  • How do we work with multi-directionality, multi-causality and provisionality in contemporary migrations? How do we map multinational migrations over time and space?
  • What kinds of methodological routes can be pursued to go beyond the single case in migration research and to seriously contemplate multi-sited research, develop comparative transnational frameworks, increase awareness of the connectivities across scales and units of analysis, and instill wariness of methodological nationalism?
  • How do we equip ourselves for the task of boundary-crossing, a task which goes hand in hand with supporting a socially progressive migration agenda?
  • How do we devise research practices that would contribute towards dismantling institutionalized practices which reproduce racisms, nationalisms and social privilege, and pave the way for a more inclusive approach in our work as migration researchers?
  • How has the “new (pandemic-)normal” featuring lockdowns, immobilities and restricted human interactions altered our ways of conducting research and reshaped existing conceptualizations of migration?

Submission of Proposals:

Paper proposals should include a title, an abstract (300 words maximum) and a brief personal biography of 150 words for submission. Please use the paper proposal form and send it in doc/docx format to Ms Rohini Anant at rohini.a@nus.edu.sg by 15 September 2021.

Please also include a statement confirming that your paper has not been published previously, it is not committed elsewhere, and that you are willing to revise your paper for potential inclusion in a special issue submission (in collaboration with the workshop organizers and other participants).

Successful applicants will be notified by end of September. Panel presenters will be required to submit drafts of papers (4,000-7,000) words by 20 December 2021. These drafts will be circulated to fellow panelists and organizers in advance.


Convenors:

Professor Brenda Yeoh






Professor Elspeth Graham



Associate Professor Lucy Jordan



Contact Info:

Ms Rohini Anant at rohini.a@nus.edu.sg


Contact Email: 

arios@nus.edu.sg

CFP: PANDEMIC, PLAGUE, PESTILENCE & THE TROPICS


Journal Special Issue theme: 

'Pandemic, Plague, Pestilence and the Tropics'

The Tropics has long been associated with exotic diseases and epidemics. This historical imaginary arose with Aristotle’s notion of the tropics as the ‘torrid zone’, a geographical region virtually uninhabitable to non-indigenous peoples due to the hostility of its climate; it persisted in colonial imaginaries of the tropics as pestilential latitudes requiring slave labour; and further into wars staged in tropical arenas where illness and death from diseases reduced the availability of healthy soldiers to die on the battle field. The tropical sites of colonialism and war gave rise to urgent (western) studies of tropical diseases which lead to changes in architecture and urban planning, to biopiracy of tropical plants and indigenous knowledges, and to the creation of institutes of tropical medicine.

The tropics as a region of pandemic, plague and pestilence has been challenged during the global pandemic of the novel coronavirus disease COVID-19. The new virus neither originated in the tropics, nor were the tropical countries of the world specifically or exclusively affected. Tropical countries have been impacted by, and responded to, the novel coronavirus in diverse ways. This disrupts the imaginary of pandemics, plagues, pestilence in association with the tropics, and calls for critical, nuanced, and situated analyses.

Indeed, critiques of the notion of the Tropics as wildly infectious sites of pandemic, plague and pestilence already have a long history, articulated through the arts, film, literature, history, cultural studies, ethnographies, social sciences and urban studies. For instance, tropical epidemics (and fear of the other) have been associated with the popular vampire myths of New Orleans; disease and colonialism is as much the setting of Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s novel Love in a Time of Cholera as are the tropics of Colombia and the Caribbean sea; in Thai director, Weerasathakul’s, film Tropical Malady malarial fevers involve shamanism and shape-shifting; ethnographic studies reveal how indigenous peoples interpret and attend to tropical illnesses; and tropical infectiousness is the germ of academic research analysing heterotopic quarantined spaces of sanatoriums constructed across the tropics.

The theme, Pandemic, Plague, Pestilence and the Tropics, opens to complex intertwinings involving nature and culture, humans and animals, colonialism and indigeneity, science and conspiracy, histories and futures, reality and fiction, myth and ritual, the monstrous and magnanimous. This special issue invites a wide range of scholary articles and creative works from researchers who live in, or engage with, the tropical and subtropical regions of the world.

eTropic: electronic journal of studies in the tropics publishes new research from Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences and allied fields on the variety and interrelatedness of nature, culture, and society in the tropics. Tropical regions of the world range across: the north of Australia, Southeast Asia, South Asia, East Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean, tropical Africa, the Indian Ocean Islands, the Pacific, the American south and Hawai’i.

 

About eTropic:

journal ISSN:1448-2940, free open access; indexed in Scopus, Google Scholar, Ulrich's, DOAJ; archived in Pandora and Sherpa/Romeo; DOIs, Crossref; Q2 ranking. 

 

Instructions for authors, visit eTropic announcements page: click here

Contact: 

Prof Anita Lundberg, Editor-in-Chief, eTropic: journal of studies in the tropics, James Cook University Australia

Email: etropic@jcu.edu.au

URL.


Submission deadline: 1 December 2020