Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta estudios modernos. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta estudios modernos. Mostrar todas las entradas

CFP: BACK FROM THE FUTURE: CRITICAL ESSAYS ON MODERN MONSTERS IN HISTORICAL NARRATIVES. 



Back from the Future: 

Critical Essays on Modern Monsters in Historical Narratives

Modern interpretations of classic stories are nothing new and each age creates its own monsters that it will automatically equate with like versions from the past—see the evolving versions on screen of Mr. Hyde and the Wolf Man for example.

In recent texts though, this placement of strikingly contemporary versions of monsters in historical texts has been used in ways that suggest more than just a simple act of “updating” is going on and that they are more purposely commenting on both our times and uses of the past and how that might impact on current political debates around nationalism, ethnic and sexual identity, and ideological and religious extremism.

Areas of interest within this can include more recent visions of classic monsters transposed back into historical settings. This can include narratives around mythological figures (Clash/Wrath of the Titans and 300), modern versions of vampires, werewolves, witches, devils and traditional folkloric characters placed in historical narratives (Van Helsing, Extraordinary Gentlemen, Outlander, Salem, Supernatural, Lucifer), or new creations such as zombies, aliens, and robots placed in periods in which they never existed (Dr Who, Kingdom, Stargate, Pride, Prejudice and Zombies).

Send 300 word abstracts or expressions of interest to Simon Bacon (baconetti@googlemail.com) by Sunday, May 31, 2021.

CFP: SPECIAL ISSUE OF LITERATURE COMPASS: "THE HISTORIES AND PRACTICES OF MODERNIST STUDIES IN ASIA"

 

Literature Compass Special Issue: 

"The Histories and Practices of Modernist Studies in Asia"

 

For a prospective peer-reviewed special issue of Literature Compass, we invite submissions that reflect on the past, present and future of modernist studies in various locations of Asia. How has “modernism” been historically conceived and studied in Asia? What institutions have shaped and are shaping the fortunes of modernist studies in Asia? How are the histories and practices of modernist studies mediated by translation among various languages used in this part of the world?

We particularly welcome essays that address the above questions in dialogue with recent reflections on the new modernist studies. For instance, the global turn in modernist studies raises what Paul Saint-Amour has called “the question of expansionism.” How to balance, in Saint-Amour’s words, “the obligation to broaden narrow canons” and “the dangers of overreach and appropriation,” not only concerns the development of Anglo-American studies of modernism but has bearings on the practice of modernist studies in other regions. Negotiating the question of the modernist canon, for instance, can have diverging implications, pedagogically, politically, and practically, in different cultural contexts. While reshaping teaching and research trajectories, it may also bring about structural changes that tend to redefine the character of academic disciplines including English, Comparative Literature, and other language and cultural programs.

Reexaminations of the new modernist studies have also drawn fresh attention to modernism’s complex relationship to institutions. Douglas Mao (2021) notes “how vitally modernist studies has been shaped by institutional substrates.” Likewise, Sean Latham and Gayle Rogers (2021) point out that spaces as varied as “journals, monographs, conferences, classrooms, anthologies, lectures, even hallway conversations” have played a pivotal role in the formation and renovation of modernist studies. The unfolding of the story of modernism in both Anglo-American and non-English-speaking settings has also been significantly mediated by translation within and without academia from the very outset. How modernism operates and circulates through multiple layers of translation and a mutual and multidirectional relationship between translation and critical scholarship remains an essential part of the evolution of global modernism. 

This special issue hopes to contribute to ongoing discussions about modernist studies through a focused analysis of its histories and practices in Asian contexts. We seek proposals for original essays that examine how modernism has been received, interpreted, and instituted in diverse sites and places in Asia. We also welcome critical investigations into how the practice of modernist studies in Asia enriches, nuances, or complicates global modernism.      

Topics of particular interest include (but are not limited to):

  • Asia and the modernist canon
  • Teaching modernism in Asia
  • Modernism and translation
  • Modernism and popular culture in Asia
  • Modernist networks in Asia
  • The circulation of modernism within Asia
  • The reception or promotion of individual modernist authors within and beyond Asia
  • Approaches to modernism peculiar to Asian contexts     

Abstracts of maximum 500 words along with short biographies are due April 15, 2021. A total of five to seven proposals will be accepted; completed essays of approximately 3,000 – 5,000 words (excluding references) will be due August 30, 2021. The submitted essays will undergo rigorous peer review. Please send abstracts to the guest editors Nan Zhang (nanzhang@fudan.edu.cn) and Kunio Shin (kshin@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp).

CFP: BETWEEN ASIA AND EUROPE: WHITHER COMPARATIVE CULTURAL STUDIES?


Between Asia and Europe: 

Whither Comparative Cultural Studies?

(Hybrid Online/Offline Conference) 

University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia May 21-22, 2021


Due to the circumstances of COVID-19, the conference is rescheduled for May 21-22, 2021, and it will be a combination of online and offline event. The deadline for your 4,000-word proposal, which includes a 100-word bio statement and a 150-word abstract, is April 15, 2021

Asia and Europe have long been recognized as the source for the majority of the religions and philosophies, the ideologies and worldviews, the aesthetic styles and fashions, that served to shape classical antiquity and prepared the way for the coming of the modern age. At times, this relationship has been seen as the site of mutual benefit. At the turn of the twentieth century, for example, comparative historians drew attention to the manner in which the lure of new industrial or scientific potential helped to elevate Asia, just as Europe opened itself up to new philosophies of architecture, art and dress. At other times, the two continents have been seen as rivals, two potentially hostile sites of power and influence. In this respect, the War in the Pacific became shorthand for a military, ideological and philosophical enmity.

As the second decade of the twenty-first century dawns, the shifting currents of global power suggest that either of these relationships may well gain come to dominate our medium-term future. It is now widely perceived that many of the dominant economic and political formations in the industrialized world—summed up in the dual regime of neoliberal globalization and liberal democracy—find themselves in an unprecedented crisis of legitimacy, and new relationships and configurations of power seem poised to emerge.

Given this context, what kind of insights might we gain about our current predicament by revisiting the origins of modernity? Alternately, how might an investigation of some of the roads not taken or the values dismissed as backwards and impractical reveal?

In the age of globalization, what points of contact between European and Asian texts have proven to be the most fruitful and significant? Alternatively, what are the ways in which Asians and Europeans have continued to misunderstand and misrepresent each other—how have Orientalism and Occidentalism changed in the present era?

What are the areas of affinity and convergence in the cultures of the Old World that have been overlooked in a global culture which is still very much dominated by the values and outlooks of the New World, i.e. the United States?

Finally, what aspects of European or Asian culture might serve as the basis for new ways of living and thinking in a future in which the economy, the environment, and the composition of national populations may well differ dramatically from the present?


We encourage submissions that take a comparative approach to the study of texts from Asia and Europe.


Possible topics include:

  • Art cinema then and now
  • Political philosophy East and West
  • Patterns of migration flow in and between Europe and Asia
  • Asian values and European traditions
  • Mysticism and spirituality in a global age
  • The reception of Western philosophy and literature in Asia
  • Religious violence and terrorism
  • Ethnic strife in Europe and Asia
  • The legacies of communism at the end of neoliberalism
  • Climate disruption across the continents
  • Trade routes: from the Silk Road to the Belt and Road project
  • The literatures and cultures of Eurasia
  • The legacies of the Second World War: the Axis Powers and Asia
  • Land and sea: the changing geopolitical landscape
  • Ruins and monuments: the persistence of antiquity
  • Pan-Asianism and the project of European unity
  • Nationalism and populism in Europe and Asia
  • The future of cultural and national identities
  • Espionage and culture
  • Tourist writing


Keynote speakers:

Dr. Anindya Raychaudhuri (University of St Andrews) “Marxist Memories: British Communists, Colonial India and Reading Imperial History through Anti-Imperial Autobiography

Dr. Nissim Otmazgin (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) “A New Cultural Geography of Eurasia? Building New Silk Roads through Popular Culture

Dr. Sowon S Park (UC Santa Barbara) “When a Jesuit Missionary from Slovenia met an astronomer from Korea in 18th C Beijing

Dr. Alexander Des Forges (University of Massachusetts-Boston) “Involution as Style and Structure.


Early inquiries with 200-word abstracts are appreciated, although the deadline for a 4,000-word proposal, which includes a 100-word bio statement and a 150-word abstract, is April 15, 2021. All correspondence should be addressed to the Editor of Situations, Terence Murphy, at tmurphy@yonsei.ac.kr and cc’d to the Managing Editor Rhee Suk Koo at skrhee@yonsei.ac.kr.

Each invited participant is expected to turn his or her initial presentation into a finished 6,000-word paper for possible inclusion in a future issue of the SCOPUS-indexed journal, Situations: Cultural Studies in the Asian Context. More information


We will provide accommodation for each invited speaker. We look forward to welcoming you to Ljubljana, Slovenia!


Co-hosted by East Asia Resource Library, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia and the Department of English Language and Literature BK21 Project, Yonsei University, Korea.

CFP: CITIES AND FANTASY: URBAN IMAGINARY ACROSS CULTURES 1830-1930 (EDITED VOLUME)



Cities and Fantasy: Urban Imaginary Across Cultures

1830–1930 (Edited Volume)


The long nineteenth century witnessed the rapid expansion and modernization of cities around the globe. It is often also heralded, by critics working with Anglo-American literature, at least, as the starting point for studies of the fantastic. Nonetheless, despite the claims of critics such as Rosemary Jackson and Stephen Prickett that modern fantasy is, in part, a reaction to industrialization, few projects have explored nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century fantasies’ engagement with the urban, and fewer still have attempted to address the interteinement of fantasy and the city across cultures, a gap this volume seeks to fill.

Studies in literary works that engage with the city during the period tend to focus on how writers represented, captured, negotiated, or, at times, contested the changes brought about by various modernisation and industrialisation projects that were often related to imperial and colonial expansion or trade and economic initiatives. The emphasis has often been on the realistic, the everyday, and the busy metropolitan space. Critics have explored how cities have become real-and-imagined places in literary works that have been conferred with symbolic and structural values (see, for example, Robert Alter’s Imagined Cities: Urban Experience and the Language of the Novel). Works such as Jamieson Ridenhour’s Darkest London: The Gothic Cityscape in Victorian Literature contribute to a growing body of work that focuses on the urban gothic, both as a sub-genre and a narrative mode in literature dating from the nineteenth century to the contemporary time. The urban gothic is an important piece of any project on fantasy and urban spaces, including this one. We also hope, however, to include contributions addressing how other forms of fantasy or work in the fantastic mode has been used to engage with the city. Even marvelous nineteenth-century idyllic fantasies usually engage with the unescapable city in some way, or even substantially. We especially seek contributions that explore fantasy and the city in different cultural contexts, or that explore the relationship between the city and fantasy across cultures, such as how fantastic literature can put cities in conversations—in metaphorical, physical or symbolic terms. 

Instead of focusing on one single national context, this edited volume invites contributions from scholars who work with texts that are situated in different cultural contexts and historic moments between 1830 to 1930. The volume seeks to raise new questions surrounding the relationship between the city and fantasy in a period that witnessed an enhanced global connectedness due to wars, advancement in technologies of transportation and communication, and other socio-economic initiatives. The proposed period covers key historic and cultural events that had both local and global significance. These include the Chartist campaign and the women’s suffrage movement in Britain, the Sino-British Opium Wars, the Meiji Restoration in Japan, the May Fourth Movement in China, the early Republican periods in many Latin America states, the First World War, and the transformation of Hong Kong into a crown colony, and an entrepôt. The period also covers the rise of new academic disciplines in Europe and America, including anthropology and folklore, which led to an increased interest in fantastic and marvelous tales from other cultures. Moreover, rising numbers of translations of this literature, as well as increased reading of works in their original languages (a foreign language for the reader), led to new reading audiences and new reception histories for fantastic texts from other countries of origin.

In this volume, we especially encourage contributors to consider topics that engage with more than one city or cultural context, or ones that explore different moments of cross-cultural interaction and contacts. Possible cities include (but are not limited to) Paris, Berlin, Cape Town, Istanbul, Beirut, Mumbai, Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Taipei, Seoul, Tokyo, Melbourne, Sydney, San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Santiago, Buenos Aires, Dublin, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Manchester, and London. Contributors might consider how writers make use of the fantastic mode to come to terms with new urban realities, or to negotiate their sense of (cultural) identity in the ever-changing metropolitan spaces. Other questions that they can consider include the following: In what ways does an investigation into the fantastic in different urban settings complicate our understanding of its potential in contesting real-and-fictive boundaries that condition or limit people’s ways of life, and their accessibility to different urban spaces because of race, gender and class? How might the fantastic be used as a strategy in literary texts that seek to interrogate or negotiate one’s relationship with the others in cities that were increasingly multicultural in outlook in the long nineteenth century? How might the fantastic be used as a form of resistance against colonial rule, or as an act of writing against the Empire? How might writers invoke the mythic and the fantasized characters from their own literary and cultural tradition when representing or negotiating the urban spaces and the underlying ideological assumptions? In what ways can the fantastic and the everyday co-exist and be used to interrogate new social realities? 

We note that the terms fantasy and the more recently coined urban fantasy are anachronistic and highly contested terms—labels used in retrospect, sometimes in narrowly defined and sometimes in broad senses, to describe existing modes and genres. Contributors to this volume are free to draw on the theoretical accounts of the fantastic that best suit their project and the critical tradition from which they write. Contributors, however, should be consistent in their usage and should note, as needed and to avoid confusion, the varying ways in which their terms have been used.


TOPICS OF INTEREST:

  • Types of fantasy that involve the city
  • Imperial and/or colonial cities and fantasy
  • Industrialization, urbanization, and fantasy
  • Border/Boundary/Liminality: how the fantastic mode is being used to confront, mediate or negotiate liminal spaces, or various forms of “borders” and boundaries in different cultural contexts
  • Medievalized cities in nineteenth-century fantasy
  • Periodicals and fantasy
  • Cities in conversation
  • Nineteenth- and early twentieth-century responses to European or American fantasies in areas and regions such as Asia, Africa, Australia, Oceania, and vice versa
  • Different fantastic modes and traditions (such as Zhiguai), and their usage and adaptations in urban contexts
  • Orientalized cities, such as translations of the Arabian Nights in the nineteenth century and their impact on subsequent literary productions
  • The city as a place of publication for fantasy (in periodicals or books); urban readers of fantasy–the types of fantasy they read.
  • Nineteenth-century cities and fantastic Romantic legacies
  • The city and the collection of fairy tales and folklore
  • The Gothic and the City
  • The Everyday and the City: how everyday spaces become sites of fantasy; how the fantastic responds to, or resists against, the everyday
  • Nostalgia, fantasy and the city
  • Fantastic urban utopias and/or fantasy and urban reform
  • Fantasy and cultural identity
  • Urban Typologies, architecture and fantasy
  • Urban palimpsest and fantasy
  • Reading fantastic cities in translation
  • The reception history of a city’s fantasies either within that city and/or in other cities across the globe

If you are interested in contributing to the edited volume, please send a short bio (100–150 words) and a 400-word abstract outlining the topic and the content, including the key authors and/or texts that will be covered in your essay, to the editors, Dr Klaudia Lee (hiuylee@cityu.edu.hk) and Dr Sharin Schroeder (sharinschroeder@mail.ntut.edu.tw) by 15 January 2021.

The deadline for full chapters, 6,000-7,000 words in length (including notes and works cited), will be 30 November 2021, subject to the final decision of the publisher. We look forward to reading your proposals.


Deadline for submissions: January 15, 2021


CONTACT INFORMATION

Full name / name of organization: Dr. Klaudia Lee and Dr. Sharin Schroeder

Contact email: sharinschroeder@mail.ntut.edu.tw