Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta ensayos. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta ensayos. Mostrar todas las entradas

CFP: BACK FROM THE FUTURE: CRITICAL ESSAYS ON MODERN MONSTERS IN HISTORICAL NARRATIVES. 



Back from the Future: 

Critical Essays on Modern Monsters in Historical Narratives

Modern interpretations of classic stories are nothing new and each age creates its own monsters that it will automatically equate with like versions from the past—see the evolving versions on screen of Mr. Hyde and the Wolf Man for example.

In recent texts though, this placement of strikingly contemporary versions of monsters in historical texts has been used in ways that suggest more than just a simple act of “updating” is going on and that they are more purposely commenting on both our times and uses of the past and how that might impact on current political debates around nationalism, ethnic and sexual identity, and ideological and religious extremism.

Areas of interest within this can include more recent visions of classic monsters transposed back into historical settings. This can include narratives around mythological figures (Clash/Wrath of the Titans and 300), modern versions of vampires, werewolves, witches, devils and traditional folkloric characters placed in historical narratives (Van Helsing, Extraordinary Gentlemen, Outlander, Salem, Supernatural, Lucifer), or new creations such as zombies, aliens, and robots placed in periods in which they never existed (Dr Who, Kingdom, Stargate, Pride, Prejudice and Zombies).

Send 300 word abstracts or expressions of interest to Simon Bacon (baconetti@googlemail.com) by Sunday, May 31, 2021.

CFP: SPECIAL ISSUE OF LITERATURE COMPASS: "THE HISTORIES AND PRACTICES OF MODERNIST STUDIES IN ASIA"

 

Literature Compass Special Issue: 

"The Histories and Practices of Modernist Studies in Asia"

 

For a prospective peer-reviewed special issue of Literature Compass, we invite submissions that reflect on the past, present and future of modernist studies in various locations of Asia. How has “modernism” been historically conceived and studied in Asia? What institutions have shaped and are shaping the fortunes of modernist studies in Asia? How are the histories and practices of modernist studies mediated by translation among various languages used in this part of the world?

We particularly welcome essays that address the above questions in dialogue with recent reflections on the new modernist studies. For instance, the global turn in modernist studies raises what Paul Saint-Amour has called “the question of expansionism.” How to balance, in Saint-Amour’s words, “the obligation to broaden narrow canons” and “the dangers of overreach and appropriation,” not only concerns the development of Anglo-American studies of modernism but has bearings on the practice of modernist studies in other regions. Negotiating the question of the modernist canon, for instance, can have diverging implications, pedagogically, politically, and practically, in different cultural contexts. While reshaping teaching and research trajectories, it may also bring about structural changes that tend to redefine the character of academic disciplines including English, Comparative Literature, and other language and cultural programs.

Reexaminations of the new modernist studies have also drawn fresh attention to modernism’s complex relationship to institutions. Douglas Mao (2021) notes “how vitally modernist studies has been shaped by institutional substrates.” Likewise, Sean Latham and Gayle Rogers (2021) point out that spaces as varied as “journals, monographs, conferences, classrooms, anthologies, lectures, even hallway conversations” have played a pivotal role in the formation and renovation of modernist studies. The unfolding of the story of modernism in both Anglo-American and non-English-speaking settings has also been significantly mediated by translation within and without academia from the very outset. How modernism operates and circulates through multiple layers of translation and a mutual and multidirectional relationship between translation and critical scholarship remains an essential part of the evolution of global modernism. 

This special issue hopes to contribute to ongoing discussions about modernist studies through a focused analysis of its histories and practices in Asian contexts. We seek proposals for original essays that examine how modernism has been received, interpreted, and instituted in diverse sites and places in Asia. We also welcome critical investigations into how the practice of modernist studies in Asia enriches, nuances, or complicates global modernism.      

Topics of particular interest include (but are not limited to):

  • Asia and the modernist canon
  • Teaching modernism in Asia
  • Modernism and translation
  • Modernism and popular culture in Asia
  • Modernist networks in Asia
  • The circulation of modernism within Asia
  • The reception or promotion of individual modernist authors within and beyond Asia
  • Approaches to modernism peculiar to Asian contexts     

Abstracts of maximum 500 words along with short biographies are due April 15, 2021. A total of five to seven proposals will be accepted; completed essays of approximately 3,000 – 5,000 words (excluding references) will be due August 30, 2021. The submitted essays will undergo rigorous peer review. Please send abstracts to the guest editors Nan Zhang (nanzhang@fudan.edu.cn) and Kunio Shin (kshin@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp).

CFP: STREAMING AND SCREEN CULTURES IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC


Re-issued Call for papers

Streaming and Screen Cultures in the Asia-Pacific

(Palgrave Macmillan, 2022)


To the surprise of analyst expectations, at the end of 2019 Netflix recorded a record-high growth in subscribers and revenue outside of the United States, specifically in its Asia-Pacific region. The growth in this region is attributed to the establishment of regional offices and the commissioning of local productions, the success of which travels even further afield in the wealth of pan-Asian content making its way into Netflix’s global catalogue. But while Netflix occupies a dominant, though increasingly threatened position in the West amongst competitors such as Amazon, Disney+ and Hulu, in the Asia-Pacific it faces bigger challenges pitted against an abundance of well-established alternatives, such as Viu (Hong Kong), iflix (Malaysia), Voot (India) and HOOQ (Singapore). While there is an emergent body of work with a focus on streaming and screen cultures in the US and Europe, limited attention has been paid to the Asia-Pacific region. Our collection wishes to address this gap, exploring Asia-Pacific’s expansive services to produce a more comprehensive picture of its contemporary streaming culture. We are therefore inviting scholars to consider the expanding stream culture in Asia-Pacific territories. 

Our collection has already attracted some exciting new work, contributing to our understanding of visual media and its contemporary cultural significance in China, Japan, South Korea, India, Thailand, and Australia. However, we are aware that our collection is incomplete. The aim of this re-circulated CFP is to therefore seek chapters that specifically explore or engage with content, technologies or viewing practices in the Australasia and Southeast Asia region.

In our previous CFP we invited scholars to engage with the following. This is, however, by no way a set list. 

  • Soft power
  • Production, distribution and reception context—nationally and internationally
  • Streaming and pop culture: narratives, forms, aesthetics, themes
  • Identity—national and regional identities
  • Gender, sexuality and sexism in visual streaming culture
  • Internationalisation and decentralisation of local/regional content
  • Media imperialism
  • Markets and audiences: viewing habits (weekly release, binge-watching, live streaming, mobility of screens), accessibility (freemium model, VOD), demographics 
  • New media, new technologies, new platforms
  • Terrestrial vs. cable vs. streaming television
  • Copyright and censorship issues


Please send a biography (no more than 150 words) and a 300 word abstract to our email asiapacificscreencultures@gmail.com by 31 January 2021.


Name of organization: 

Dr Michael Samuel (Warwick) and Dr Louisa Mitchell (Independent Scholar)

XIII CONCURSO DE ENSAYO SOBRE LITERATURA COREANA


XIII Concurso de Ensayo sobre Literatura Coreana

Oficina UMA-ATECH Puente con Corea


    El Vicerrectorado de Movilidad y Cooperación Internacional a través de la Oficina UMA-ATECH Puente con Corea, junto al Vicerrectorado de Cultura de la Universidad de Málaga y en colaboración con el Literature Translation Institute of Korea (LTI Korea), se complacen en presentar el XIII Concurso de Ensayo sobre Literatura Coreana realizado en colaboración con el LTI-Korea (Literature Translation Institute of Korea).

    En esta edición del concurso nos centraremos en la obra “Los Planificadores” -traducida al castellano- del autor Un-Su Kim. Es autor de varias novelas que han sido muy bien recibidas por la crítica y el público. Ganó el Munhakdogne, el premio literario más importante de Corea, y fue nominado al Gran Prix de Littérature Policière en 2016. Con “Los planificadores”, una novela negra que nos adentra en el mundo del crimen organizado en Corea, da el salto definitivo al público occidental.

    El concurso tiene como objetivo presentar y difundir la cultura coreana, a través de su literatura, entre los miembros de la comunidad universitaria de Málaga, Sevilla y Granada, y la ciudadanía de la provincia de Málaga promover el conocimiento de la obra “Los Planificadores” de Un-Su Kim mediante un concurso de ensayo organizado por la Universidad de Málaga.

    “Los Planificadores” | Sinopsis:

    Lo importante no es quién dispara, sino quién está detrás del que aprieta el gatillo.

    Los planificadores trabajan en la sombra para organizar crímenes que ejecutarán asesinos profesionales como Reseng.  El joven, que ha crecido entre las paredes de una biblioteca y entre asesinos y conspiraciones, ha sido educado por un planificador al que llaman Viejo Mapache. Reseng cumple con su inevitable destino y se convierte en un asesino, hasta que rompe las reglas. Ahora solo le queda confiar en tres mujeres que trabajan por su cuenta y que han ideado su propio complot, pero ¿puede fiarse de ellas? 


    Información General

    Participantes:

    Podrán participar todos los miembros de la comunidad universitaria (alumnos, PAS y PDI) de:

    Así como los/las ciudadanos/as de la provincia de Málaga.

    Cuya vinculación corresponda al año académico 2020.

    Inscripción:

    El plazo de inscripción es desde el día de la publicación de la presente convocatoria hasta el 9 de noviembre de 2020.

    Premios:

    Los premios para se cobrarán en especie establecidos en los siguientes valores: 

    1. Primer premio: dispositivo electrónico valorados en 700€
    2. Segundo premio: dispositivo electrónico valorados en 500
    3. Tercer premio: dispositivo electrónico valorados en 300€

    Los premios serán dispositivos electrónicos elegidos por la organización del concurso.

    Documentos Concurso:

    Para más información sobre obligaciones, plazos y entrega del ensayo:

    Inscripciones:

    Envío de ensayo:

    CFP: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: ORIENTALISM, REVERSE ORIENTALISM AND BEYOND IN LITERATURE AND FILM


    Through the Looking Glass: 
    Orientalism, Reverse Orientalism and Beyond in Literature and Film
    CFP for edited collection (2020)


    Statement of Aims

    The influence of Edward Said’s Orientalism over the last four decades, both in its specific theoretical applications to Asia and the Middle East, and in its more nebulous uses across a range of disciplines and interdisciplinary fields in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, has been well documented and closely debated. For the purposes of this discussion it should be noted that the term “Asia” is conceived broadly to not only encompass South, East and Southeast Asia but to also include countries from the region of Western Asia, amongst which are those geographical, political or cultural formations collectively referred to as the “Middle East”. Said’s central proposition—reinforced in subsequent commentaries such as The World, the Text and the Critic (1983) and Culture and Imperialism (1993)—that Occidental spheres of influence and imperialist policies produced not only physical colonisation but a construction of an imaginary “East” (including a “Far East” and “Middle East”) which robbed Asia and Arab regions of their agency in terms of self-representation is, though refuted by some, generally acknowledged across a number of academic disciplines. Whether one accepts this creed or is opposed to it there is little argument that, for better or worse, it invariably frames and at times overwhelms theoretical analysis of East-West interaction. Subsequent analysis of Western fictional texts located in Asia or representing aspects of Asia, and Asian texts either responding to Western canonical works and Western representations of Asia, or representing Western culture(s), has invariably been dominated by this binary of East-West power dynamics. Yet, while noting that these perspectives have (arguably) served as a useful ideological starting point in many such discussions, more recent processes of globalisation, transnationalism, and multimedia may render such binary polarities as superfluous.

    CFP: 2019 FALL/WINTER ISSUE YONSEI JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES


    2019 Fall/Winter Issue Yonsei Journal of International Studies
    The Yonsei Journal of International Studies (YJIS) is a biannual interdisciplinary journal affiliated with the Center for International Studies and run by the Yonsei University Graduate School of International Studies in Seoul, South Korea. The YJIS welcomes submissions from all scholars, especially graduate students and junior professors that fall within the diverse field of International Studies.